圓珠筆草圖硬剛成片：Image2 vs Flare/Sunburst

提示詞

A ballpoint scribble went in as the only image. Three finished photographs came out.

GPT Image 2 vs 2.5, specimen 03: sketch to image. The input was a crude composition diagram in ballpoint, shapes only, with handwritten notes such as 5 ARCHES and KEEP HIM SMALL. The prompt told each model to read it as a blueprint and follow the notes. Same prompt, one run each, first result kept. GPT Image 2 at High, 2.5 Sunburst and 2.5 Flare at Max, all 4K.

All three followed the diagram: five arches, a locomotive and four carriages heading left with steam trailing right, a small figure on a boulder at lower left with a bicycle, pine at the right edge, river from the lower right, sun upper right behind the hill. No handwriting made it into the picture, no paper texture either.

Where they part: GPT Image 2 turned the gorge into open moorland with a wide shallow river, and its mist under the arches is a few wisps near the water. Sunburst has the densest mist under the arches. Flare's mist sits mostly in the far valley.

Verdict, from one person going through the originals: GPT Image 2 and Flare look better. Sunburst has a lot of high-frequency noise, so the image looks dirty and less clear. That was at Max quality.

Method and what you pay in the reply.

中文翻譯

一張圓珠筆塗鴉作爲唯一輸入。輸出三張成品照片。

GPT Image 2 vs 2.5，樣本 03：草圖到圖像。輸入是一幅用圓珠筆畫的粗糙構圖示意圖，只有形狀，並帶有手寫註釋，例如 5 ARCHES 和 KEEP HIM SMALL。提示詞要求每個模型把它當作藍圖來讀，並遵循這些註釋。相同提示詞，各跑一次，保留第一個結果。GPT Image 2 使用 High，2.5 Sunburst 和 2.5 Flare 使用 Max，全部 4K。

三張都遵循了示意圖：五道拱門；一輛機車和四節車廂朝左行駛，蒸汽向右拖曳；左下方一塊巨石上有個小小的人影和一輛自行車；右邊緣有松樹；河流從右下方延伸而來；太陽在右上方山丘之後。畫面中沒有出現任何手寫筆跡，也沒有紙張紋理。

它們的差異在於：GPT Image 2 把峽谷變成了開闊的荒原，配一條寬闊的淺河，拱門下的薄霧只是水邊幾縷。Sunburst 拱門下的霧最濃密。Flare 的霧大多停留在遠處的山谷中。

結論，來自一個人逐一查看原圖：GPT Image 2 和 Flare 看起來更好。Sunburst 有大量高頻噪點，因此畫面看起來髒、不夠清晰。而這還是在 Max 質量下。

方法與所需花費見回覆。

溯源

原作者

FlyAIgh

發佈日期

2026-09-16

原始出處

查看原帖 ↗

收錄來源

xianyu110/awesome-gpt-image2.5 · 2100205158911361300 · MIT