Opus 5.5 just one-shot this entire pixel-art game. Oh, and the prompt? It was barely three sentences. I gave claude creative license to make whatever game it wanted to, and oh boy did it cook
The capabilities of this model are genuinely ridiculous, I fed GPT Sol-6 the same prompt and the results were shockingly poor. Seems like Sol-6 is taking the Opus 5 role this time around.
With models becoming this good, I'm struggling to see the need to purchase games anymore. If you can have any game you want created in a single prompt, with beautiful art, story, etc - what's the point of sinking $60+?
Lol, obviously because the stories and ideas that humans have are still way better than whatever these models can still do. However, the gaming industry is definitely going to be shaken now - excited to see what's gonna come out of this!
Anyway, here's a side by side comparison of both outputs, thoughts?
Also if you wanted to play it yourself:
https://skerry-light.vercel.app/
Left is Claude, right is Opus
中文翻譯
Opus 5.5 一次就把這整個像素畫遊戲做出來了。哦對了，提示詞呢？只有三句話。我給了 claude 創作自由，讓它隨便做什麼遊戲，天哪，它真的做出來了。
這個模型的能力簡直離譜，我把同樣的提示詞餵給 GPT Sol-6，結果差得驚人。看來這次 Sol-6 接過了 Opus 5 的角色。
模型強到這個地步，我越來越覺得沒必要再買遊戲了。如果你能用一個提示詞就讓任何想要的遊戲被創造出來，還有漂亮的畫面、故事等等——那還花 60 多美元圖什麼呢？
哈哈，顯然是因爲人類擁有的故事和創意仍然比這些模型能做到的好得多。不過，遊戲行業現在肯定要被震動了——很期待會有什麼東西冒出來！
總之，下面是兩個輸出的並排對比，你們怎麼看？
另外，如果你想自己玩：
https://skerry-light.vercel.app/
左邊是 Claude，右邊是 Opus
