角色设计表压测：2 / Sunburst / Flare 同题

提示词

GPT Image 2.5 is now on FlyAIgh. First test: a character design sheet, one prompt, run once each through GPT Image 2, 2.5 Sunburst and 2.5 Flare. Same words, three sheets, that order below.

Why a design sheet: it checks layout, small type, multiple views, a silhouette study and detail callouts in a single image.

What differs, checked image by image:

Silhouette study. GPT Image 2 leaves its three silhouettes unlabeled. Sunburst numbers and names them: 01 STILLNESS, 02 MOVEMENT, 03 PRESENCE. Flare labels them FRONT, SIDE, BACK.

Color palette. GPT Image 2 has none. Sunburst lists four colors as text. Flare paints them as solid dots.

Sheet numbering. Only Sunburst numbers the whole sheet 01 to 06. Flare, same generation, does not.

Taken together: Sunburst reads like a portfolio page, Flare like a spec handed to production. One pull each, so no winner called. Caveats and what each costs in the reply.

中文译文

GPT Image 2.5 现已登陆 FlyAIgh。首次测试：一张角色设计表，一个提示词，分别用 GPT Image 2、2.5 Sunburst 和 2.5 Flare 各跑一次。同样的文字，三张设计表，顺序见下方。

为什么选设计表：它能在单张图片里检验版面、小字号文字、多个视图、剪影研究和细节标注。

差异所在，逐张图检查：

剪影研究。GPT Image 2 的三个剪影没有标注。Sunburst 为它们编号并命名：01 静谧、02 动态、03 存在感。Flare 则标注为正视、侧视、背视。

配色方案。GPT Image 2 没有配色方案。Sunburst 以文字列出四种颜色。Flare 把它们画成实心圆点。

设计表编号。只有 Sunburst 把整张设计表编号为 01 到 06。同一轮生成的 Flare 则没有。

综合来看：Sunburst 读起来像作品集页面，Flare 像交给制作环节的规格说明。各只跑了一次，因此不评判胜负。注意事项以及各自的成本见回复。

溯源

原作者

FlyAIgh

发布日期

2026-09-14

原始出处

查看原帖 ↗

收录来源

xianyu110/awesome-gpt-image2.5 · 2099482513693622358 · MIT