UGC 自然皮肤翻车：2.5 在这场景偏 mid

提示词

I spent the last 3 days testing GPT Images 2.5 for AI UGC models. 🤯

not gonna sugarcoat it - it's mid. actually kind of bad for this specific use case.

here's what happened:

i needed a UGC-style creator photo. natural skin, real lighting, someone who looks like she just picked up her phone and started filming - not a "generated" face.

GPT Images 2.5 kept giving me:
- plastic, over-smoothed skin
- that same "AI face" symmetry
- lighting that looks studio-lit even when i asked for natural window light
- hands and props (rings, necklaces, furniture) subtly glitching
i regenerated probably 40+ times. same issues every time. so out of frustration i ran the exact same prompt through Nano Banana Pro.
first output. this 👇

skin texture, pores, real shadow falloff from the window, a necklace that actually sits right, hair flyaways - the kind of imperfect detail that makes a photo feel real instead of rendered. The only is the voice, but i keep working on it.

this is the difference between "AI generated" and "AI that could pass as a real creator."

if you're building UGC ad creative and still defaulting to GPT Images, you're leaving quality on the table. switch and see for yourself.

中文译文

过去 3 天我一直在用 GPT Images 2.5 测试 AI UGC 模特。🤯

不兜圈子——它偏 mid，对这一个具体用例来说其实有点糟。

事情是这样的：

我需要一张 UGC 风格的创作者照片。自然的皮肤、真实的光线，看起来像她刚拿起手机就开始拍——而不是一张“生成感”的脸。

GPT Images 2.5 一直给我：
- 塑料感、过度磨皮的皮肤
- 那种千篇一律的“AI 脸”对称感
- 即便我要求自然窗光，打光看起来仍像影棚灯
- 手和道具（戒指、项链、家具）出现细微的错误
我大概重新生成了 40 多次。每次都是同样的问题。于是出于沮丧，我把完全相同的 prompt 丢给 Nano Banana Pro。
第一次出图就是这样 👇

皮肤质感、毛孔、窗户带来的真实阴影衰减、一条佩戴位置终于正确的项链、发丝碎发——正是这种不完美的细节，让照片显得真实，而不是渲染出来的。唯一的问题是声音，不过我还在继续打磨。

这就是“AI 生成”和“AI 能冒充真实创作者”之间的差别。

如果你在做 UGC 广告素材，却仍然默认用 GPT Images，那你就是在白白丢掉质量。换一个试试，自己看。

溯源

原作者

ItsNazar17

发布日期

2026-09-11

原始出处

查看原帖 ↗

收录来源

xianyu110/awesome-gpt-image2.5 · 2098396894082843074 · MIT