Claude Opus 5.5 is absurdly good at 3D.
I reran one of my recent 3D experiments with Claude Opus 5.5.
Same prompt, same references, same real-world scene I had previously built with GPT-6 Astra.
The result was much better than I expected.
Put simply, for this specific use case, Claude Opus 5.5 was a clear win for me.
The biggest differences for me were instruction following and taste.
With the same references, Opus 5.5 got much closer to the Zelda Breath of the Wild-style look I was aiming for.
The layout felt more intentional.
It picked better camera angles.
Asset placement made more sense.
And I spent much less time fixing basic mistakes.
In my Astra version, I had to repeatedly correct things like tree roots not touching the ground, rough geometry being used where proper assets already existed, or objects being placed in ways that just looked wrong.
Opus 5.5 got much more of this right on its own.
The interesting part for me is that I have almost zero real 3D skills.
I mostly give references, look at the result, explain what feels wrong, and keep iterating.
With better instruction following and visual judgment, that loop becomes dramatically easier.
Still plenty to improve, especially indoors.
Next test is whether I can recreate the interior of the house with the same level of quality.
中文翻譯
Claude Opus 5.5 在 3D 上強得離譜。
我用 Claude Opus 5.5 重跑了我最近的一個 3D 實驗。
同樣的提示詞、同樣的參考、同樣的真實場景，這個場景我之前是用 GPT-6 Astra 搭建的。
結果比我預期的好得多。
簡單說，就這個特定用例而言，Claude Opus 5.5 對我來說是明顯的勝出。
對我來說，最大的差別在於指令遵循和品味。
用同樣的參考，Opus 5.5 更接近我一直想要的那種 Zelda Breath of the Wild 風格觀感。
佈局感覺更像是刻意爲之。
它選了更好的鏡頭角度。
資產擺放更合理。
而且我花在修基本錯誤上的時間少得多。
在我的 Astra 版本裏，我得反覆糾正這類問題：樹根沒有接觸到地面、本來就有合適的資產卻用了粗糙的幾何體，或者物體擺放的方式看着就是不對。
Opus 5.5 自己就把其中更多的東西做對了。
對我來說有意思的是，我幾乎沒有真正的 3D 技能。
我主要是給參考、看結果、說出哪裏感覺不對，然後不斷迭代。
有了更好的指令遵循和視覺判斷，這個循環就變得容易得多。
還有不少要改進的，尤其是室內。
下一個測試是：我能不能以同樣的質量復刻這棟房子的室內。
