Claude Opus 5.5 is absurdly good at 3D.
I reran one of my recent 3D experiments with Claude Opus 5.5.
Same prompt, same references, same real-world scene I had previously built with GPT-6 Astra.
The result was much better than I expected.
Put simply, for this specific use case, Claude Opus 5.5 was a clear win for me.
The biggest differences for me were instruction following and taste.
With the same references, Opus 5.5 got much closer to the Zelda Breath of the Wild-style look I was aiming for.
The layout felt more intentional.
It picked better camera angles.
Asset placement made more sense.
And I spent much less time fixing basic mistakes.
In my Astra version, I had to repeatedly correct things like tree roots not touching the ground, rough geometry being used where proper assets already existed, or objects being placed in ways that just looked wrong.
Opus 5.5 got much more of this right on its own.
The interesting part for me is that I have almost zero real 3D skills.
I mostly give references, look at the result, explain what feels wrong, and keep iterating.
With better instruction following and visual judgment, that loop becomes dramatically easier.
Still plenty to improve, especially indoors.
Next test is whether I can recreate the interior of the house with the same level of quality.
中文译文
Claude Opus 5.5 在 3D 上强得离谱。
我用 Claude Opus 5.5 重跑了我最近的一个 3D 实验。
同样的提示词、同样的参考、同样的真实场景，这个场景我之前是用 GPT-6 Astra 搭建的。
结果比我预期的好得多。
简单说，就这个特定用例而言，Claude Opus 5.5 对我来说是明显的胜出。
对我来说，最大的差别在于指令遵循和品味。
用同样的参考，Opus 5.5 更接近我一直想要的那种 Zelda Breath of the Wild 风格观感。
布局感觉更像是刻意为之。
它选了更好的镜头角度。
资产摆放更合理。
而且我花在修基本错误上的时间少得多。
在我的 Astra 版本里，我得反复纠正这类问题：树根没有接触到地面、本来就有合适的资产却用了粗糙的几何体，或者物体摆放的方式看着就是不对。
Opus 5.5 自己就把其中更多的东西做对了。
对我来说有意思的是，我几乎没有真正的 3D 技能。
我主要是给参考、看结果、说出哪里感觉不对，然后不断迭代。
有了更好的指令遵循和视觉判断，这个循环就变得容易得多。
还有不少要改进的，尤其是室内。
下一个测试是：我能不能以同样的质量复刻这栋房子的室内。
